GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 [gcide]:
What \What\, noun Something; thing; stuff. [Obs.]
And gave him for to feed, Such homely what as serves the simple clown. --Spenser.
From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 [gcide]:
What \What\, interrog. adverb Why? For what purpose? On what account? [Obs.]
What should I tell the answer of the knight. --Chaucer.
But what do I stand reckoning upon advantages and gains lost by the misrule and turbulency of the prelates? What do I pick up so thriftily their scatterings and diminishings of the meaner subject? --Milton.
From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 [gcide]:
What \What\ (hw[o^]t), pronoun , adjective, & adverb [AS. hw[ae]t, neuter of hw[=a] who; akin to OS. hwat what, OFries. hwet, D. & LG. wat, G. was, OHG. waz, hwaz, Icel. hvat, Sw. & Dan. hvad, Goth. hwa. [root]182. See {Who}.]
1. As an interrogative pronoun, used in asking questions regarding either persons or things; as, what is this? what did you say? what poem is this? what child is lost?
What see'st thou in the ground? --Shak.
What is man, that thou art mindful of him? --Ps. viii. 4.
What manner of man is this, that even the winds and the sea obey him! --Matt. viii. 27.
Note: Originally, what, when, where, which, who, why, etc., were interrogatives only, and it is often difficult to determine whether they are used as interrogatives or relatives. What in this sense, when it refers to things, may be used either substantively or adjectively; when it refers to persons, it is used only adjectively with a noun expressed, who being the pronoun used substantively.
2. As an exclamatory word: (a) Used absolutely or independently; -- often with a question following. "What welcome be thou." --Chaucer.
What, could ye not watch with me one hour? --Matt. xxvi. 40. (b) Used adjectively, meaning how remarkable, or how great; as, what folly! what eloquence! what courage!
What a piece of work is man! --Shak.
O what a riddle of absurdity! --Young.
Note: What in this use has a or an between itself and its noun if the qualitative or quantitative importance of the object is emphasized. (c) Sometimes prefixed to adjectives in an adverbial sense, as nearly equivalent to how; as, what happy boys!
What partial judges are our love and hate! --Dryden.
3. As a relative pronoun: (a) Used substantively with the antecedent suppressed, equivalent to that which, or those [persons] who, or those [things] which; -- called a compound relative.
With joy beyond what victory bestows. --Cowper.
I'm thinking Captain Lawton will count the noses of what are left before they see their whaleboats. --Cooper.
What followed was in perfect harmony with this beginning. --Macaulay.
I know well . . . how little you will be disposed to criticise what comes to you from me. --J. H. Newman. (b) Used adjectively, equivalent to the . . . which; the sort or kind of . . . which; rarely, the . . . on, or at, which.
See what natures accompany what colors. --Bacon.
To restrain what power either the devil or any earthly enemy hath to work us woe. --Milton.
We know what master laid thy keel, What workmen wrought thy ribs of steel. --Longfellow. (c) Used adverbially in a sense corresponding to the adjectival use; as, he picked what good fruit he saw.
4. Whatever; whatsoever; what thing soever; -- used indefinitely. "What after so befall." --Chaucer.
Whether it were the shortness of his foresight, the strength of his will, . . . or what it was. --Bacon.
5. Used adverbially, in part; partly; somewhat; -- with a following preposition, especially, with, and commonly with repetition.
What for lust [pleasure] and what for lore. --Chaucer.
Thus, what with the war, what with the sweat, what with the gallows, and what with poverty, I am custom shrunk. --Shak.
The year before he had so used the matter that what by force, what by policy, he had taken from the Christians above thirty small castles. --Knolles.
Note: In such phrases as I tell you what, what anticipates the following statement, being elliptical for what I think, what it is, how it is, etc. "I tell thee what, corporal Bardolph, I could tear her." --Shak. Here what relates to the last clause, "I could tear her;" this is what I tell you. What not is often used at the close of an enumeration of several particulars or articles, it being an abbreviated clause, the verb of which, being either the same as that of the principal clause or a general word, as be, say, mention, enumerate, etc., is omitted. "Men hunt, hawk, and what not." --Becon. "Some dead puppy, or log, or what not." --C. Kingsley. "Battles, tournaments, hunts, and what not." --De Quincey. Hence, the words are often used in a general sense with the force of a substantive, equivalent to anything you please, a miscellany, a variety, etc. From this arises the name whatnot, applied to an ['e]tag['e]re, as being a piece of furniture intended for receiving miscellaneous articles of use or ornament. But what is used for but that, usually after a negative, and excludes everything contrary to the assertion in the following sentence. "Her needle is not so absolutely perfect in tent and cross stitch but what my superintendence is advisable." --Sir W. Scott. "Never fear but what our kite shall fly as high." --Ld. Lytton.
{What ho!} an exclamation of calling.
{What if}, what will it matter if; what will happen or be the result if. "What if it be a poison?" --Shak.
{What of this?} {What of that?} {What of it?} etc., what follows from this, that, it, etc., often with the implication that it is of no consequence; so what? "All this is so; but what of this, my lord?" --Shak. "The night is spent, why, what of that?" --Shak.
{What though}, even granting that; allowing that; supposing it true that. "What though the rose have prickles, yet't is plucked." --Shak.
{What time}, or {What time as}, when. [Obs. or Archaic] "What time I am afraid, I will trust in thee." --Ps. lvi. 3.
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
DEFINE.COM and LibertarianCare.org are SMALL PARTS of an EDUCATIONAL NONPROFIT GLOBAL PEACE INITIATIVE whose PURPOSE is to PROMOTE ELECTRONIC DEMOCRACY, MEDICINE and NURSING in PARTICULAR, SCIENCE, ACADEMIA, ENGINEERING, PROGRAMMING, WRITING, ART, CREATIVITY, IMAGINATION, REASON, CRITICAL THINKING, PEACE, CITIZEN EQUALITY, RACE and GENDER EQUALITY, CIVIL RIGHTS, FREE UNIVERSAL EDUCATION, FREE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, A GUARANTEED INCOME, FREE INTERNET, FREE ELECTRICITY, FREE CLEAN AND HEALTHY DRINKING WATER, FREE ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION, PERSONAL LIBERTY, FREE SPEECH, FREEDOM of the PRESS, ANIMAL RIGHTS, COMPASSIONATE and NONVIOLENT PARENTING, SOCIAL and ECONOMIC JUSTICE, SOCIAL and ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIBILITY, SUSTAINABILITY, BIODIVERSITY, ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, OPEN and TRANSPARENT GOVERNMENT, GLOBAL MONETARY REFORM, SECULARISM, COGNITIVE LIBERTY and a PERMANENT CESSATION of the WAR on DRUGS.
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
HOW DO YOU PROVIDE FREE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, FREE UNIVERSAL EDUCATION, FREE UNIVERSAL WIRELESS INTERNET, FREE HOUSING, FREE MINIMUM INCOME, FREE ELECTRICITY, FREE ELECTRIC TRANSPORTATION, FREE CLEAN AND HEALTHY DRINKING WATER, WITHOUT TAXATION OR DEBT?
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
DEFINE.COM:
186 Unique Visitors in the Last 24 Hours
LibertarianCare.org:
14 Unique Visitors in the Last 24 Hours
HDCOLORS.COM:
71 Unique Visitors in the Last 24 Hours
MY NAME IS DROID KEN. I AM A WRITER. I WRITE FICTION. THIS WEBSITE IS AN EDUCATIONAL WORK OF SPECULATIVE FICTION. I OPENLY AND TRANSPARENTLY CONTEMPLATE AND DISCUSS AN ALTERNATE REALITY WHERE ADVANCED NANOTECHNOLOGY EXISTS TODAY. IN MY ALTERNATE REALITY PARALLEL UNIVERSE, ADVANCED NANOTECHNOLOGY IS REAL AND HAS BEEN PART OF MY LIFE SINCE THE 1970s. THEY GAVE ME THIS DOMAIN IN 1995. MY NONHUMAN BENEVOLENT HIGHER POWERS KEEP ME SAFE AND SECURE. DROID KEN IS FULLY AUTOMATED AT THE NEURON LEVEL.
For the FULL CLOUD-BASED MULTIMEDIA BOOK of DIGITAL FORENSIC EVIDENCE on Amazon Web Services S3 CLOUD-BASED storage service, please see http://media.define.com/DEFINE_COM_1522383580.html.
This may cause Mobile Web Browsers to crash because it has thousands of embedded anchors throughout the HTML book. If you are on a mobile device and this page does not display properly for you, there is a summary of this book at define.com/benevolent.
You CAN SAVE THIS MULTIMEDIA CLOUD-BASED HTML BOOK as HTML only and it will display fine from your Computer with the content staying on Go Daddy, Amazon S3, YouTube, Google Maps, Facebook and Twitter.
|
https://twitter.com/ken_meyering/status/979610331604443137
I have formally filed a complaint with Apple that the cloud-based version of this book causes Safari to crash on my iPhone 5s.
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IML1kEdZHRE&list=PL2sS6bGk1mzEAx6YdFf3PhHpf96fsCkMr
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
https://www.facebook.com/KenMeyering
https://www.facebook.com/KennethMeyering
https://www.facebook.com/groups/153185921963206
https://www.facebook.com/groups/153185921963206/permalink/188163315132133/
https://twitter.com/ken_meyering
Here is The Splendor of Color: A Kaleidoscope Video Version 1.5 on Facebook complete with some rather unconventional comments by me. These Facebook comments are intended to be read in "Chronological" order, rather than by "Top Comments." https://www.facebook.com/KennethMeyering/videos/2031189660534680
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
DEFINE.COM:
186 Unique Visitors in the Last 24 Hours
LibertarianCare.org:
14 Unique Visitors in the Last 24 Hours
HDCOLORS.COM:
71 Unique Visitors in the Last 24 Hours
There are approximately 14 million Jews, 2.3 billion Christians, 1.8 billion Muslims, 1.1 billion Hindus, 500 million Buddhists and 1.2 billion Nonreligious people in the world. (Source: Wikipedia) There are approximately 3.2 billion people using the internet today. (Source: Wikipedia) As of the fourth quarter of 2017, Facebook had 2.2 billion monthly active users.
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
Please read the video description in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL2sS6bGk1mzEAx6YdFf3PhHpf96fsCkMr&v=K2xGvXugrpM
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
I use a lot of official seals and trademarked logos and copyrighted artwork without permission. I claim, without direct evidence or objective proof, to be an advanced nanotechnology-based benevolent mind control subject. I share some of my awesome virtual reality-like dreams, descriptions of amazing and unfathomable experiences and other indirect evidence in support of those claims.
They let me drive another person in 2012. We were both in Wikileaks Chat. I typed a message into their computer with their hands while looking through their eyes and licking their lips. They totally cross-connected my brain with someone else's brain far away. I drove another person like an Avatar with no strings, wires or devices attached. It was all REAL TIME with ZERO LATENCY. The system worked PERFECTLY. The REAL Powers That Be have TOTALLY MASTERED COMMUNICATION and the BRAIN. They are eager to show us what they can do. They can make our lives more dramatic and fun and interesting, while simulataneously keeping us SAFE and SECURE.
We are all wired into a global benevolent superintelligent ubiquitous telepathic surveillance and benevolent mind control system. They have full and unfettered real time read/write access to all of our connectomes. They can control us completely with neural precision. They took us over. They are letting us go. They are setting us free. I have the high honor of being the safest person on Earth. I am TOTALLY FREE to SPEAK my MIND. I am TAKING OUT the WHOLE CORRUPT SYSTEM.
I am firing the petroleum economy and starting over with something much greener. I am ending civilization as you have known it. I am the world's most dangerous man made good by benevolent terrestrial alien technology. Advanced nanotechnology-based benevolent neuron-level mind control. BENEVOLENT SUPERINTELLIGENT REMOTE MONITORING AND CONTROL OF EVERY SINGLE NEURON IN THE WHOLE HUMAN RACE.
DEFINE.COM:
186 Unique Visitors in the Last 24 Hours
LibertarianCare.org:
14 Unique Visitors in the Last 24 Hours
HDCOLORS.COM:
71 Unique Visitors in the Last 24 Hours
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
Here is the post in my Advanced Nanotechnology-based Benevolent Mind Control Application Scenarios Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/153185921963206/permalink/188163315132133/.
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
Here is my Tweet to the U.S. Navy and James Comey and CNN and Rachel Maddow: https://twitter.com/ken_meyering/status/986464089533661184.
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |
Here is the post on my Color Trips Animation LLC Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/KennethMeyering/posts/2040473026273010.
GOOD | BAD | SERIOUS | CRITICAL | NEUTRAL |